More Practice. Better Feedback. A Stronger Debate Club.

Give every speaker feedback they can use and more ways to practice between rounds. Symbai brings live debates, AI-assisted adjudication and your club’s resources together, with you in control.

Start your 2-month free trial

Two months free. No commitment.

Make Your Coaching Time Go Further

Give every speaker a clear next step

Turn each round into written adjudication, individual feedback and suggested practice that students can revisit.

Focus on the speakers

Keep timing, live transcription and notes together. Use AI assistance to review the round, then make the final judgement yourself.

Keep students practising

Students can build cases, practise rebuttal and debate against AI between club sessions.

Build a lasting club record

Keep students, teams, resources and debate history connected, ready for next term and the next coach.

How Symbai Works

1

Run Your Round

Choose the format and speakers, check the timing bells and start. Timers, live transcription and your notes stay together as students debate.

2

Give Feedback That Lasts

Review the transcript and AI suggestions, then confirm your judgement. Share written adjudication, individual speaker feedback and clear next steps.

3

Keep the Practice Going

Set targeted follow-up activities. Students can review the round in DebateTree, strengthen a case or practise rebuttal with AI before the next session.

Built by School Debate Coaches

Connor McFadyen

Connor McFadyen

Founder & CEO
Seven years as a school Teacher in Charge of debating.

Meet Connor

Sharuka Wikramanayake

Sharuka Wikramanayake

Chief Product Officer
Former New Zealand national high school coach and World Universities semi-finalist.

Meet Sharuka

Try Symbai With Your Own Debaters for Two Months

Run real rounds, review speaker feedback and try independent practice with your own students.

Two months free. No commitment.

Your existing club work and non-AI tools remain accessible on the free tier if you choose not to continue.

One Account for the Work Around Your Debate Club

Live Debate Workspace

Run format-aware rounds with speaker allocations, timers, bells, POI tracking, live transcription and adjudication notes.

Adjudication & Speaker Feedback

Turn a completed round into a written adjudication, individual speaker feedback and targeted follow-up activities.

Interactive DebateTree Review

Open the debate visually to inspect how arguments, rebuttals and points of clash developed across the round.

Independent AI Practice

Give students rebuttal practice, AI opposition and tutoring between live rounds — with difficulty and support adjusted to the student.

Students & Persistent Teams

Manage your squad, build reusable teams, save normal speaking positions and organise student accounts from the coach dashboard.

Scheduled Debates

Prepare upcoming rounds in advance with the motion, format, speakers and adjudication settings already organised.

How Symbai Builds Core Debating Skills

Adjudication & Feedback

Adjudication & Feedback

Without Symbai

  • Adjudicators have to listen, flow the debate, take notes and prepare feedback at the same time.
  • Most feedback is delivered orally and is quickly forgotten.
  • Individual speakers may receive only a small amount of personalised feedback.
  • Students often know who won without fully understanding how the debate was decided.
  • Valuable coaching insight disappears once the round is over.

With Symbai

  • Run the same live debate you would normally run.
  • Use Symbai to help create a clear written adjudication from the round.
  • Give students feedback they can revisit after the session.
  • Provide individual speaker feedback rather than relying solely on a single team-level discussion.
  • Review the debate visually through its interactive DebateTree when deeper analysis is useful.
  • Move between the accessible written adjudication and the underlying argument structure without requiring coaches to learn DebateTree before they get value from the system.
  • Review and edit AI-supported adjudication: the human coach remains in control.

Simple setup for live adjudication

AI-assisted adjudication relies on clear audio from the debate. For reliable capture, use a Bluetooth lapel microphone with the device running Symbai.

There is no need for specialist audio equipment — a basic lapel microphone costing around $20 is sufficient.

Spend less of the round fighting your notes — and give students feedback that lasts long after the adjudication finishes.

Live Human Debating

Live Human Debating

Without Symbai

  • Practice rounds can become isolated events.
  • Notes, ballots and feedback are scattered across documents or paper.
  • Students who miss the oral adjudication lose most of its value.
  • Coaches have limited time to turn every practice debate into a meaningful follow-up activity.

With Symbai

  • Create and organise live debates from the coach account.
  • Keep the debate, adjudication and feedback connected.
  • Share completed debates with students for review.
  • Use the same round as the basis for later coaching and practice.
  • Preserve useful debate history rather than starting from zero each session.

Live debating remains the centre of the club — Symbai makes each round more useful before, during and after it happens.

AI Practice & Rebuttal

AI Practice & Rebuttal

Without Symbai

  • Rebuttal practice usually requires another debater to be available.
  • Students may only get a handful of meaningful speaking or rebuttal opportunities each week.
  • Less confident students can struggle to experiment during limited live practice time.
  • Coaches cannot personally provide unlimited practice to every student.

With Symbai

  • Students can practise against an AI opponent independently.
  • The Rebuttal Toolkit encourages more strategic responses than simply disagreeing with an argument.
  • Students can request counterarguments and pressure-test their own ideas.
  • DebateTree makes chains of argument and rebuttal visible.
  • AI tutoring and guidance can be enabled when useful or removed when students should work independently.

Give every debater more meaningful repetitions between the live rounds that matter most.

Case Construction & Preparation

Case Construction & Preparation

Without Symbai

  • Student cases often become pages of disconnected notes.
  • Arguments can sound detailed without being logically deep.
  • Coaches spend significant time creating examples and explaining structure repeatedly.
  • Students frequently prepare content without testing how an opposition might respond.

With Symbai

  • Build arguments visually using editable DebateTrees.
  • Generate exemplars that coaches can adapt to an appropriate level.
  • Make claims, reasons, evidence and responses visible as parts of a larger argument.
  • Stress-test cases with generated rebuttals.
  • Share structured preparation that students can actually use during a debate.

Help students see the architecture of their case — and discover its weaknesses before the opposition does.

The Two Most Effective Ways to Improve Critical Thinking

Unified in Symbai

Debating

Hundreds of thousands of students across 60 countries choose to spend their free time in formal debating competitions because it improves their critical thinking skills. 

Formal debating improves:

  • Dynamic reasoning — adapting ideas under pressure

  • Strategic thought — anticipating and countering objections

  • Cognitive discipline — structuring arguments with clarity and purpose

Increases Critical Thinking By Up To 50%

Competitive debate produces greater critical thinking improvement than argumentation courses.
Allen et al. measured the improvement using the Watson–Glaser critical-thinking test — a gold-standard assessment of inference, deduction, and evaluation skills.”
Source

8.6% Critical Thinking Gains In Just 3 Weeks

Students who participated in debate competition showed statistically significant improvements in critical thinking scores after just three weeks.
An 8.6% improvement in critical thinking is the cognitive equivalent of dropping your resting heart rate from 70 to 64 BPM. That's not learning facts or techniques — that's developing lasting cognitive fitness.
Source

9 in 10 former debaters go on to earn at least one advanced degree.

Of 703 National Debate Tournament alumni, over 90% held a graduate or professional degree, and many held multiple advanced degrees.
Of the 703 former NDT debaters; 40% earned master’s degrees (MA, MSc, MBA, MEd, etc.), 20% earned doctoral degrees (PhD, MD, EdD) and many held multiple advanced or professional degrees.
Source
Argument Mapping

Argument mapping has been around for hundreds of years, used by philosophers, scientists, and modern critical-thinking educators to make critical thinking clearer by drawing it out.
And for good reason: when done well, argument mapping is one of the most effective ways to improve critical thinking and develop sharper logical reasoning.

Argument mapping helps you:

  • Clarify reasoning by revealing the actual structure of your thinking
  • Expose weak links that get lost in normal prose
  • Build precision through visual logic rather than persuasive writing tricks
A simple argument map diagram showing a “Main Claim” at the top supported by a “Reason” and “Evidence,” along with an “Objection” connected to a counter-reason, illustrating the structure of logical argumentation.

Improves Critical Thinking Courses By Over 300%

Critical thinking courses that used argument mapping software saw students improve their critical thinking over 300% more than similar critical thinking courses.
Compared a standard logic class to one using argument mapping software. The mapping group made dramatically greater gains on a standardized critical thinking test, far exceeding typical semester improvements.
Source

One Semester Of Argument Mapping Produces 6-7x MORE Critical Thinking Gains Than One Semester Of Normal University Study

Semester-long CT courses using digital argument mapping consistently produced effect sizes of 0.7-0.85 on standardized critical thinking tests. By comparison, a typical university semester yields just 0.11
Source

9% Critical Thinking Gains In Just Weeks

Five weeks of an argument mapping-led course resulted in an average critical thinking gain of 9%
These gains were achieved with minimal explicit critical thinking teaching. The gains came from interactions with other students within argument mapping software.
Source

 

Debating develops the habits that critical thinking courses try to teach:

  • Dynamic reasoning — adapting ideas under pressure

  • Strategic thought — anticipating and countering objections

  • Cognitive discipline — structuring arguments with clarity and purpose

If debating is the clash of ideas, argument mapping is the architecture that makes clear thinking possible.
It’s the practice of breaking critical thinking into smaller parts — claims, evidence, objections, and assumptions — and arranging them so the logic becomes visible.

Argument mapping has been around for hundreds of years, used by philosophers, scientists, and modern critical-thinking educators to make critical thinking clearer by drawing it out.
And for good reason: when done well, argument mapping is one of the most effective ways to improve critical thinking and develop sharper logical reasoning.

Argument mapping helps you:

  • Clarify reasoning by revealing the actual structure of your thinking

     

  • Expose weak links that get lost in normal prose

     

  • Build precision through visual logic rather than persuasive writing tricks

     

These benefits make it a powerful method for anyone looking to enhance critical thinking skills, improve decision-making, or analyze arguments more effectively.

But traditional argument mapping has limits:

  • Pen and paper mapping is slow and quickly becomes cluttered
  • Digital mapping tools speed things up but remain static
  • And because the map never talks back, even skilled thinkers can hit writer’s block when faced with a silent diagram