Sign Up 

 Sign Up        Login

Sign Up 

Symbai Ai Logo - the future of critical thinking education

Gifted and Talented

Stretch Thinkers. Spark Independence.

Symbai challenges advanced learners with independent, critical thinking tasks — without adding to teacher prep time.

BOOK A FREE DEMO

The Real Problem

G&T students hit a ceiling fast: busywork, slow pacing, and limited peer challenge. Motivation dips, perfectionism spikes, and teachers can’t always build fresh extension for every lesson.

The Symbai Solution

Symbai delivers high-challenge, student-led debate at the right level—on demand. Expert-level prompts, a neutral AI opponent, and structured argument flow keep advanced learners engaged and stretching, without extra teacher prep

See how extension changes when challenge is structured, student-led, and easy to run.

Class/Group Discussions → Enhanced with Symbai

Without Symbai

  • Busywork disguised as “extension”
  • Over-talkers dominate; quieter thinkers hold back
  • Inconsistent depth and feedback
  • Teacher time spent building one-off tasks

With Symbai

  • Expert-level debates ready in minutes
  • Neutral AI opponent pushes precision and depth
  • Independent practice that scales to each learner
  • Evidence you can act on (focus time, responses, progress)
Result - Deeper thinking, sustained engagement, and visible progress— WITHOUT INCREASING TEACHER WORKLOAD

What Makes Symbai Ideal for Gifted Learners

Formal Debate Structure

Real rigor, not “more of the same.” Students argue, rebut, and counter using competitive debate flow.

AI That Argues Back

A neutral, always-on opponent pushes clarity and logic — great for independent extension and pull-out sessions.

Expert Difficulty (for Stretch)

Advanced prompts, tighter reasoning, and academic vocabulary for true G&T challenge (while Easy–Hard support regular learners).

Visual Debate-Tree (Mind Map)

— See complex ideas clearly: claims–evidence–analysis mapped for Scholarship-style writing and speaking.

View All Features

Key Benefits for Students

Think Both Sides at Pace

Practise rebuttal and counter-argument under pressure.

Own Your Progress

Independent work with clear outputs (and Instant Essay Export for portfolios).

Safe Space to Stretch

Rigorous, non-emotional sparring that builds confidence for live forums.

What Teachers Gain

High-Level Thinking, Low Overhead

Extension ready in minutes, not hours.

Curriculum-Aligned, Fast

Upload course facts/motions; test what you teach at a higher bar.

Differentiation That Scales

Set level per student; no re-creating resources.

BUILT FOR TEACHERS, BY TEACHERS
Where It Fits in Your GATE Program

Use Symbai to:

  • Differentiate in mainstream classes without extra prep.
  • Provide targeted challenge for top students during regular lessons.
  • Run enrichment groups or G&T sessions with minimal setup.
  • Support inquiry-based or independent project work
tRY FOR FREE

Raise the Bar — Not Your Workload

Symbai helps advanced learners thrive with structured, self-driven debate — and it takes minutes to implement.

Book a walkthrough Demo to see how it fits into your classroom or

TRY FOR FREE

What others are saying

“I believe Symbai has the potential through its unique multi-AI approach to become ubiquitous in the field of critical thinking in the way that Grammarly is associated with writing or Quizlet is with flash cards.”



Nick Hanne 
Education Partnerships Manager at the Free Speech Union NZ

“Symbai fills a major gap in education — it equips students to think logically, independently, and critically. Unlike other tools, it offers a neutral, AI-driven platform where students can genuinely practise debating and refine their thinking. It’s like having a 24/7 mentor that challenges without bias. A powerful solution for those seeking depth over group think in today’s education landscape.”


Todd Roughton 
Former Principal, HSNZ

The Two Most Effective Ways to Improve Critical Thinking

Unified in Symbai

Debating

Hundreds of thousands of students across 60 countries choose to spend their free time in formal debating competitions because it improves their critical thinking skills. 

Formal debating improves:

  • Dynamic reasoning — adapting ideas under pressure

  • Strategic thought — anticipating and countering objections

  • Cognitive discipline — structuring arguments with clarity and purpose

Increases Critical Thinking By Up To 50%

Competitive debate produces greater critical thinking improvement than argumentation courses.
Allen et al. measured the improvement using the Watson–Glaser critical-thinking test — a gold-standard assessment of inference, deduction, and evaluation skills.”
Source

8.6% Critical Thinking Gains In Just 3 Weeks

Students who participated in debate competition showed statistically significant improvements in critical thinking scores after just three weeks.
An 8.6% improvement in critical thinking is the cognitive equivalent of dropping your resting heart rate from 70 to 64 BPM. That's not learning facts or techniques — that's developing lasting cognitive fitness.
Source

9 in 10 former debaters go on to earn at least one advanced degree.

Of 703 National Debate Tournament alumni, over 90% held a graduate or professional degree, and many held multiple advanced degrees.
Of the 703 former NDT debaters; 40% earned master’s degrees (MA, MSc, MBA, MEd, etc.), 20% earned doctoral degrees (PhD, MD, EdD) and many held multiple advanced or professional degrees.
Source
Argument Mapping

Argument mapping has been around for hundreds of years, used by philosophers, scientists, and modern critical-thinking educators to make critical thinking clearer by drawing it out.
 And for good reason: when done well, argument mapping is one of the most effective ways to improve critical thinking and develop sharper logical reasoning.

Argument mapping helps you:

  • Clarify reasoning by revealing the actual structure of your thinking
  • Expose weak links that get lost in normal prose
  • Build precision through visual logic rather than persuasive writing tricks
A simple argument map diagram showing a “Main Claim” at the top supported by a “Reason” and “Evidence,” along with an “Objection” connected to a counter-reason, illustrating the structure of logical argumentation.

Improves Critical Thinking Courses By Over 300%

Critical thinking courses that used argument mapping software saw students improve their critical thinking over 300% more than similar critical thinking courses.
Compared a standard logic class to one using argument mapping software. The mapping group made dramatically greater gains on a standardized critical thinking test, far exceeding typical semester improvements.
Source

One Semester Of Argument Mapping Produces 6-7x MORE Critical Thinking Gains Than One Semester Of Normal University Study

Semester-long CT courses using digital argument mapping consistently produced effect sizes of 0.7-0.85 on standardized critical thinking tests. By comparison, a typical university semester yields just 0.11
Source

9% Critical Thinking Gains In Just Weeks

Five weeks of an argument mapping-led course resulted in an average critical thinking gain of 9%
These gains were achieved with minimal explicit critical thinking teaching. The gains came from interactions with other students within argument mapping software.
Source

 

Debating develops the habits that critical thinking courses try to teach:

  • Dynamic reasoning — adapting ideas under pressure

  • Strategic thought — anticipating and countering objections

  • Cognitive discipline — structuring arguments with clarity and purpose

Increases Critical Thinking By Up To 50%

Competitive debate produces greater critical thinking improvement than argumentation courses.
Allen et al. measured the improvement using the Watson–Glaser critical-thinking test — a gold-standard assessment of inference, deduction, and evaluation skills.”
Source

8.6% Critical Thinking Gains In Just 3 Weeks

Students who participated in debate competition showed statistically significant improvements in critical thinking scores after just three weeks.
An 8.6% improvement in critical thinking is the cognitive equivalent of dropping your resting heart rate from 70 to 64 BPM. That's not learning facts or techniques — that's developing lasting cognitive fitness.
Source

9 in 10 former debaters go on to earn at least one advanced degree.

Of 703 National Debate Tournament alumni, over 90% held a graduate or professional degree, and many held multiple advanced degrees.
Of the 703 former NDT debaters; 40% earned master’s degrees (MA, MSc, MBA, MEd, etc.), 20% earned doctoral degrees (PhD, MD, EdD) and many held multiple advanced or professional degrees.
Source

If debating is the clash of ideas, argument mapping is the architecture that makes clear thinking possible.
 It’s the practice of breaking critical thinking into smaller parts — claims, evidence, objections, and assumptions — and arranging them so the logic becomes visible.

Argument mapping has been around for hundreds of years, used by philosophers, scientists, and modern critical-thinking educators to make critical thinking clearer by drawing it out.
 And for good reason: when done well, argument mapping is one of the most effective ways to improve critical thinking and develop sharper logical reasoning.

Argument mapping helps you:

  • Clarify reasoning by revealing the actual structure of your thinking

     

  • Expose weak links that get lost in normal prose

     

  • Build precision through visual logic rather than persuasive writing tricks

     

These benefits make it a powerful method for anyone looking to enhance critical thinking skills, improve decision-making, or analyze arguments more effectively.

But traditional argument mapping has limits:

  • Pen and paper mapping is slow and quickly becomes cluttered
  • Digital mapping tools speed things up but remain static
  • And because the map never talks back, even skilled thinkers can hit writer’s block when faced with a silent diagram